(continued from page 1)
By Gerry Healy
1964The NewsletterGerry Healy Read the scan at ETOL (PDF) →Read from the scan by machine and not corrected: headlines and words can be misread, and a caption or advert can run into the text. For anything you quote, read the scan.
neither the Pablo international centre in Paris nor the Socialist Workers Party wanted such a discussion.
One of the claims made on behalf of a hasty unification was that it would influence dissidents within the Communist Parties who were affected by the Sino-Soviet dispute.
This, of course, has not taken place since the Ceylon sectionperhaps the only seation which could have influenced the pro-Chinese movement in Asiaopenly flouted the decisions of the unified congress and a section of the leadership gave its support to Khrushchev.
In Ceylon itself the Communist Party suffered a serious split with Glas PUBLIC MEETING Greet The Newsletter Sunday, June artick Burgh Hall (Lesser Hal Burgh Hall Street (Underground to Merkland St. Station)
Speaker:
itional Secretary, Socialist Labour Leag Secretary, Socialist I union groups breaking away and being expelled for supporting the Chinese. This group may well develop into a serious threat from the left to the opportunist leaders of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party.
Similarly in the United States the Socialist Workers Party, to ali intents and purposes a liberal, petty-bourgeois, centrist organisation is threatened with increasing political competition from the organisation called Progressive Labour which broke away from the Communist Party.
Thus we can see the disastrous policies of Pabloism and the heavy price the international movement has to pay for not supporting our struggle for a principled unification Glasgow MEETI